An RFID observation can inform an inventory adjustment, but a controlled workflow still needs evidence, a reason, review, authorization and an auditable system update.
01 / SAHA NOTU
Separate observation from proposal
Keep the raw identity and read context distinct from the proposed quantity, location or status change. Define the reconciliation rule that makes an observation a candidate adjustment, and keep uncertain observations out of an automatic final state.
02 / SAHA NOTU
Attach evidence and reason
Classify missing, unexpected, duplicate, damaged, relocated, retired and master-data-related conditions with reason codes the operator and reviewer can understand. Link the proposal to the relevant observation, expected record and any follow-up check.
03 / SAHA NOTU
Route exceptions to an owner
Define who investigates each variance type, the evidence they need and the action that closes, rejects or escalates it. A queue without ownership can make unresolved observations disappear from daily work without resolving the underlying condition.
04 / SAHA NOTU
Require accountable approval
Set the role that may approve, reject or amend an adjustment, including appropriate separation between the person proposing and the person authorizing it. Do not allow a reader observation or automated retry to bypass the agreed control model.
05 / SAHA NOTU
Confirm system delivery
Record the submitted adjustment, target-system response, retry or rejection and final state. Test partial batches, duplicate submissions, offline work and recovery after a failed update so retry behavior does not create a second adjustment.
06 / SAHA NOTU
Review the closed change
Retain the final adjustment, evidence, reason, approver and resulting system state according to the project policy. Use closed cases to identify recurring tag, master-data, location or process conditions that need a separate corrective action.
Malzeme, hareket, hedef okuma ve sistem bağlamınızı numune veya teklif talebine ekleyin.
Request a sample test